| Harvey R. Stone 2005-04-02, 4:24 pm |
|
<drceephd2@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:1111686404.334079.231540@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> drceep...@netscape.com wrote:
>
> The correct reference is Dr. Gerauld Campble (? ) and "A doctor's
> proven new home cure for arthritis" avialble at Amazon.com
>
> Sorry for the mistake.
>
> DrC PhD
>
actually, it's 'really' , Giraud W. Campbell D.O. and it's a 1972 book
[though similar tomes were issued in the late '60's] published by Parker
Publishing Company...hardly anything new, yet still not part of the
accepted theories...
and just so everyone understands, this is the publishing company that was
been sued for:
"Respondent is obtaining remittances of money through the mail by means of
the foregoing false representations"
those representations being the 'health' claims contained in health diet
books...
"CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Respondent is engaged in a scheme or device for obtaining money or
property through the mails by means of false representations within the
meaning of 39 U.S.C. 3005. "
peddled at the same time they published this one by campbell - a company to
be trusted for suuuuuure...in fairness it has been put out at a later time
by other publishers.
and for the newbies - drcphd [ our old buddy who used to be honest and use
his aol addy] is one who has touted that germs don't cause disease...
"The idea of a bacterial cause of disease began in 1760. Bechamp,
1816-1895, proved that bacteria do not enter the body to cause disease
circa 1870. The Dodd sisters opened the St. Louis school for physicians and
surgeons in 1904."
"The doctor of the future will interest the patient in the care of the
human
frame, in diet, and in the cause and prevention of disease, and a medical
theory which will not include bacteria, viruses, retro-viruses, prions. or
auto-immunine excuses as the cause of any disease. "
"The practice of medicine is not scientific. The practice of medicine
fails
every test of scientific credibitlity.
If medicine were scientific, we would not belive in germs and viruses as
causes
of disease any more than a child might believe in Santa Claus."
'course now, just one example, this ignores the proven fact that certain
bacteria are the cause of most ulcers...and did you know he's
anti-vaccination?
personally, i love this one:
"Rabies is no more a threat to your life than a bite from a flea."
and:
"A correct protocol will allow the body to heal itself from every, yes
every disease.
Ergo, no "disease specific" protocol is needed."
but as to his diet theory? care to explain just 'how' it is that after more
than 30 years this 'expert' is unable to provide actual studies proving the
theory?
and just how is it that, after 3 decades, his 'diet' has not been shown by
clinical trial to actually work?
oh - that's right - you believe in the grand conspiracy...
Subject: Re: AMA's Number One Priority???
"Again, it is a disease industry. Health is just the opposite of what they
want
and need in order to make the profits they want and garner the power they
desire."
for those unfamiliar - the gist is that a dirty colon is the cause - and
while it is undisputable that some folks have an immune reaction to what is
transferred from the colon into the blood system -
that is a far cry from explaining all the myriad and diverse 'auto' immune
conditions - not to mention the traumatic injury forms, that make up the
arthritis family - but hey, what are a few facts when dealing with these
folks?????
if you want to experiance a series of coffee enemas a dictated by these
folk - feel free! not to mention the contradiction embodied in the claim
that this diet has been responsible for regrowth of hip and spine
bone...without having to actually prove it though...
for those with a long memory, this dufus is a traveling companion of the
falconblanco bunch
after removing the self-aggrandizing claims contained in the book, it boils
down to:
one more fairly reasonable thesis for improving one's diet - carried to an
extreme.
ah well... i do find it droll, and sad
|