| Don Saklad 2006-06-28, 8:20 am |
| http://liamscheff.com/blog/2006/05/...rous-new-trend/
http://zork.net/dsaklad/blog
Would the antithesis of this be that if one tests a corpse
for HIV it would come back to life?
> I just want to pick up on a point Noreen made about "HIV"
> prevention. The most reliable way to prevent an "HIV infection"
> is to avoid testing. Given the Perth Group's account of the
> results of oxidative stress triggering the tests, one might
> assume that if they eliminated all stressors and established
> redox balance with antioxidants, they should be able to avoid
> triggering a "positive" test result. But, these tests are
> non-specific and are triggered by a wide range of conditions
> and factors, so there simply is no reason to assume that even
> without a redox imbalance something will not trigger the test.
>
> While I have yet to be firmly diagnosed with MS, after many
> months it looks like that is the way my doctors are headed as
> it is about the only condition that explains all of my
> symptoms. While I have done little research into MS yet, I am a
> bit puzzled as to why LDN would be used on MS patients, unless
> it was to treat the side effects of MS drugs. The problem with
> MS is not a low CD$ count it is that T-cells attack
> myelin. Like other auto-immune conditions it is a problem of
> T-cells attacking self, hence the standard allopathic treatment
> is to suppress the immune system. It makes no sense to take a
> drug which claims to increase T cells when they are part of the
> problem in the first place. I can see trying immune modulating
> herbal treatments, but nothing that claims to "boost the immune
> system."
>
> As for CD$ counts it should be obvious to anyone who keeps up
> with the more recent dissident critiques (see for example
> Dr. Matt Irwin) that these counts are pretty much
> meaningless. People get sick with high counts and low counts,
> and what is normal for one person will not be for
> another. Stopping smoking will reduce a count, but it is hardly
> evidence that smokers are healthier than non-smokers. The
> orthodoxy's latest syndrome, known as IRS, IRD or IRIS, is the
> most obvious example of the meaninglessness of these
> counts. Rather than take a drug I would suggest the most
> obvious way to avoid a low CD$ count is to not take the
> test. Like the "HIV" test, CD$ counting is part of the voodoo
> hex.
http://liamscheff.com/blog/2006/05/...rous-new-trend/
http://zork.net/dsaklad/blog
|