| Don Saklad 2006-06-27, 2:19 am |
| http://liamscheff.com/blog/2006/05/...rous-new-trend/
http://zork.net/dsaklad/blog
Would the antithesis of this be that if one tests a corpse
for HIV it would come back to life?
> I just want to pick up on a point Noreen made about
> "HIV" prevention. The most reliable way to prevent an
> "HIV infection" is to avoid testing. Given the Perth
> Group's account of the results of oxidative stress
> triggering the tests, one might assume that if they
> eliminated all stressors and established redox
> balance with antioxidants, they should be able to
> avoid triggering a "positive" test result. But, these
> tests are non-specific and are triggered by a wide
> range of conditions and factors, so there simply is
> no reason to assume that even without a redox
> imbalance something will not trigger the test.
>
> While I have yet to be firmly diagnosed with MS,
> after many months it looks like that is the way my
> doctors are headed as it is about the only condition
> that explains all of my symptoms. While I have done
> little research into MS yet, I am a bit puzzled as to
> why LDN would be used on MS patients, unless it was
> to treat the side effects of MS drugs. The problem
> with MS is not a low CD$ count it is that T-cells
> attack myelin. Like other auto-immune conditions it
> is a problem of T-cells attacking self, hence the
> standard allopathic treatment is to suppress the
> immune system. It makes no sense to take a drug which
> claims to increase T cells when they are part of the
> problem in the first place. I can see trying immune
> modulating herbal treatments, but nothing that claims
> to "boost the immune system."
>
> As for CD$ counts it should be obvious to anyone who
> keeps up with the more recent dissident critiques
> (see for example Dr. Matt Irwin) that these counts
> are pretty much meaningless. People get sick with
> high counts and low counts, and what is normal for
> one person will not be for another. Stopping smoking
> will reduce a count, but it is hardly evidence that
> smokers are healthier than non-smokers. The
> orthodoxy's latest syndrome, known as IRS, IRD or
> IRIS, is the most obvious example of the
> meaninglessness of these counts. Rather than take a
> drug I would suggest the most obvious way to avoid a
> low CD$ count is to not take the test. Like the "HIV"
> test, CD$ counting is part of the voodoo hex.
http://liamscheff.com/blog/2006/05/...rous-new-trend/
http://zork.net/dsaklad/blog
|