| GMCarter 2006-06-06, 8:19 am |
| On 6 Jun 2006 02:22:17 -0700, monty1945@lycos.com wrote:
>The onus is on the claimant to meet the basic standards of the
>scientific method. However, I would be glad to be given the
>opportunity to meet this standard, but in "HIV/AIDS" land, the
>definition somehow is believed to trump the scientific method, in that
>if I were to show that what "AIDS patients" are exposed to causes the
>"syndrome" I would be told "well, it can't be AIDS because they tested
>negative and then developed symptoms" (I would isolate the subjects so
>that they could not "contract HIV"). Thus, what you are asking is an
>impossibility, and the worst aspect of this is that you probably don't
>realize how you are violating basic logic and just plain, old common
>sense here.
What in the world are you dithering about? Is this supposed to
represent some type of experimental design?
Or merely a confirmation of the Re line....Denialists use
pseudoscience. I'd say that sums up this deranged, poorly thought out,
ethically bankrupt nonsense.
And you claim to have even the remotest clue about scientific methods?
George M. Carter
|