| Scott Hedrick 2005-03-29, 6:22 pm |
|
"Sheila" <aliwes1@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:42489D20.2277C235@netscape.net...
> Don't you understand, there is no verifiable evidence.
I *do* understand that, which is why there is no legal or moral reason to
believe that what her husband wishes is contrary to her wishes, since he was
in the best possible position to know her wishes when she was last able to
state them.
Besides give
> food and water is not extraordinary.
Depends on how available it is.
When you don't know you should err
> on the side of life as withholding food and water without her consent is
> murder.
If you believe this, then why haven't you reported it to the police?
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
contributed[vbcol=seagreen]
I notice you forgot to answer this one. Clearly, *talking* is one thing, but
actually *doing* something to support your beliefs is quite another.
|