| Iconoclaster 2005-11-25, 12:57 am |
| >""could have been" is not in the paper--that's your words for the lamest
ever commentary on a paper."
Of course it's not in the paper. That would give their game away. But
it's inherent in the method. Thy amlify small pieces of nucleic acid,
amplify them with a messy co-culture, which is notoriously unreproducible,
and then *calculate* how many "HIV-particles" they must have started
with.
And you tell me there are thousands of these stories more? How many of
them did you read? I hope not too many, because that would mean you're
wasting the second half of your life also.
|